Even if i'm not in the top 100 in New York, US, it would be interesting to see what # I rank and who is above/below me.

When looking at the history graph, the space between entries is the same regardless if it is one day or many days. It seems like it would be more accurate if the spacing was linear. That way the resulting graph would have the right slope for the time period in question.

If I access your site through a link like:
http://tweet.grader.com/coryat sometimes I get a lower grade rank then if I use the grade button, which is usually higher. Seems odd.

I'm a 99.7 based on what?

If a tweep has posted nothing for a period of time (e.g., 2 weeks, 3 months, ..) then lower their score accordingly. As it is, accounts set up for conferences, University courses and the like are not active but still appear to have a following (while following few if any).

How about a tool to search all your follower to see which ones are not following you. I know you can check individual people.

I have a grade of 100 and over 30,000 followers and live in Oakland! What's up?

I notice that those who follow 10% of those who follow them get higher scores that people with higher follower/following numbers. I don't think this kind of nonreciprocal relationships should be valued higher than reciprocal relationships (follow those who follow you). Social media is about mutual relationships, not eliteness.

When performing a search for influencers in key topic areas, please could you add functionality allowing us to download the results you return as a CSV file? I'm always having to transfer the by hand :(

I like finding new people in my location. A button to follow them from the page would make it easier and i wouldnot have to go to their twitter page.

It seems like the Top Elite should resemble the U.S. Elite plus people from other countries. But the ranking of U.S. Twitterers on the two lists is completely different. And some people who have a higher ranking (200s, 300s) are somehow listed in the Top 100. I guess what I'm looking for is consistency, it would add credibility to Twitter Grader. I understand you don't want to publicize your exact algorithm/formula but users want to know that, however it is determined, it is applied fairly. Sometimes, as much as I love Twitter Grader, that is not always apparent.

The tweet cloud on Twitter Grader is a bit sad... Compare http://tweetstats.com/graphs/DearRobot#tcloud with the one generated by grader: http://twitter.grader.com/dearrobot

I like to filter the friend sugestions by location, tags or language.

Currently Cambridge, Ontario, Cambridge, Massachusetts and Cambridge, UK are all lumped together when they are all completely different places.

Top Locations (ranked states) included D.C. but cuts off at 50, excluding Montana. If you are including non-states, shouldn't the number of rankings increase accordingly?

Add the ability to Grade one's degree of influence among twitterers in a certain location. Note: this would be different from just listing the universal twitter grades of all those in a particular location by numerical order. Instead, this would be a localized score, using the same algorithms that the universal score uses, but only for those within a defined location.

I've seen people with zero tweets and and a really high grade because hundreds have followed them. This isn't a great measure of influence.

I think if someone is following more people then follow them, it should count against them. This would avoid following everyone in order to get a better "grade".